Mood of the Boardroom: Act Party leader David Seymour strikes right note with CEOs (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: Act Party leader David Seymour strikes right note with CEOs (NZ Herald)

Act Party leader David Seymour’s performance since the 2023 general election has been met with mostly positive reviews from the business community.

Rated at 3.4/5 by respondents to this year’s Mood of the Boardroom survey, on a scale where 1 represents “not impressive” and 5 “very impressive,” his clear, pragmatic approach resonates with many executives.

However, not all are supporters.

A professional director believes Seymour has become too extreme in his views and is losing support from many of those who may have voted for him in his electorate.

“This divisive approach needs to end; this is not the Kiwi way,” she says.

Business leaders have provided a cautiously positive response to Seymour’s establishment of a Ministry of Regulation, intended to improve the quality and performance of regulatory systems across the government.

The ministry’s new Strategic Intentions document outlines its mission as “improving the regulations imposed by the Government, making them better, more streamlined, and easier for New Zealanders to navigate.”

Scoring the ministry’s importance at 3.51/5, many respondents see it as a potential driver of future economic growth and something that is urgently needed in New Zealand.

“Cut the red tape and let us get on with turning the economy around,” comments a logistics boss.

A professional director acknowledges that “intelligent management of regulation is very challenging but critically important”.

Deloitte chair Thomas Pippos echoes this sentiment, noting that New Zealand’s over-regulation “creates a deadweight cost on the economy”.

However, the boardroom is reserving judgment on the ministry’s effectiveness, citing a lack of progress.

“It is important, but it hasn’t achieved anything yet — there should have been some quick wins by now,” says a professional director.

An infrastructure executive agrees, stating: “It is moving too slow and needs to act with more urgency. Bureaucracy is costing New Zealand a significant amount.”

There were also calls for the ministry to focus on significant economic issues rather than what some perceive as minor concerns.

The ministry’s first two sector reviews are currently underway, considering early childhood education and agricultural and horticultural products.

A law firm CEO asks: “Probably important, but hasn’t achieved anything. Why prioritise early childhood education?”

Others emphasised the need for a balanced approach to regulation.

Foodstuffs North Island CEO Chris Quin stresses that regulation is crucial for keeping high standards, ensuring there are safeguards, and making sure everyone is playing fair.

“Good governance gives us credibility and reassures investors that we’re a good place to do business and to invest in,” he says. “The key is striking the right balance — regulation should benefit consumers and boost competition, without scaring off investment.

“We don’t want to be the Wild West, but we don’t want to be so regulated we stifle growth and innovation either. Robust cost-benefit analysis of key regulatory decision is key.”

Despite support for the ministry’s mandate, there are concerns about its implementation and Seymour’s broader political agenda.

“The Ministry of Regulation feels like a way to justify having a voice on all major legislation,” says an investment executive.

“If Seymour was really focused on long-term economic growth and productivity, that would be fine, but his obsession with divisive social issues that energise people on the fringes of the New Zealand political debate make him the wrong person to wear that badge.”

The head of a professional services firm suggests there is a need for a more comprehensive approach.

“I wouldn’t have set this up as a ministry that cherry-picks sectors for review and change. I would have required every agency of government to outline why certain regulations are still necessary and drive system-wide multi-sector change at pace with economic growth and productivity the determining factor.”

There has also been criticism over the ministry’s average salary of $154,500 for its staff, which some view as contrary to the coalition Government’s pledge to reduce back-office spending.

“I am truly appalled at the news of pay rates within the ministry,” a public sector CEO says.

Mood of the Boardroom: Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins’ low profile, low ratings (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins’ low profile, low ratings (NZ Herald)

After Jacinda Ardern’s unexpected resignation in early 2023, Chris Hipkins was the sole nominee for Labour’s leadership.

Following nine months as Prime Minister, Labour was swept out of power, but Hipkins has held on, continuing as party leader and leader of the Opposition.

His performance in this role has been met with lukewarm reviews from business leaders in this year’s Mood of the Boardroom survey. They give him a score of 2.26/5 on a scale where 1 represents “not impressive” and 5 “very impressive”.

Mood of the Boardroom: Greens, Te Pāti Māori political leaders face mixed ratings (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: Greens, Te Pāti Māori political leaders face mixed ratings (NZ Herald)

Survey respondents to the Mood of the Boardroom have given mixed ratings to the leaders of New Zealand’s minor opposition political parties, highlighting a range of concerns and criticisms.

The Green Party has been through significant turmoil since last year’s election. In January, Golriz Ghahraman resigned amid shoplifting allegations. A month later, Fa’anānā Efeso Collins collapsed and died at a charity event in Auckland.

In August, Julie Anne Genter was found in contempt and censured for shouting at a Cabinet minister during a parliamentary session in May. In June, Darleen Tana was suspended by the party following a damning report into her knowledge of alleged migrant exploitation at her husband’s business.

That same month, co-leader Marama Davidson announced her diagnosis of breast cancer.

Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick receives a rating of 2.48/ 5, with some executives describing her handling of the Darleen Tana issue as “impressive” but overall, her performance is seen as lacking depth.

“Swarbrick appeals to the young, but her thinking is full of simplistic slogans,” Jarden managing director Silvana Schenone notes.

Mood of the Boardroom: War in Taiwan could hit New Zealand trade hard, executives say (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: War in Taiwan could hit New Zealand trade hard, executives say (NZ Herald)

Executives were asked in the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey whether they are concerned the China-Taiwan conflict could escalate into war and if it would affect New Zealand’s interests.

Some 68% of business leaders say they are concerned. The remaining 22% are not, while 10% say they are unsure.

China’s significance to New Zealand’s economy means any disruption to trade would have far-reaching effects.

Barfoot & Thompson managing director Peter Thompson reflects this concern.

“China is a big player for New Zealand business, and if war broke out, trade deliveries would be slowed, having a huge impact on businesses back here, similar to during the Covid period.”

Mood of the Boardroom: Kamala Harris leads among NZ CEOs in US presidential election preference (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: Kamala Harris leads among NZ CEOs in US presidential election preference (NZ Herald)

New Zealand business leaders have expressed a clear preference for Vice-President Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump in the upcoming United States presidential election.

When asked in the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey (out tomorrow) who they believe would be the best politician to lead the US, 82% of respondents favour Harris, while only 4% support Trump, with a further 10% unsure and 4% opting for “other”.

This compares to 2020 where 66% of respondents backed Joe Biden and 5% supported Trump. In the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton was the clear favourite with 92% support, compared to 5% for Trump.

Harris officially became the Democratic presidential nominee two weeks after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race in July, marking a dramatic turn in US politics. As the first woman of colour to lead a major party’s presidential ticket, Harris could be on the cusp of becoming the first female President of the United States. Despite this strong preference for Harris, the excitement for her from New Zealand’s business community is subdued.

Mood of the Boardroom: Mood of the Boardroom: Business leaders’ optimism hits highest level since 2016 (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: Mood of the Boardroom: Business leaders’ optimism hits highest level since 2016 (NZ Herald)

Senior business leaders’ optimism on the New Zealand economy has surged.

Respondents to the Herald’s 2024 Mood of the Boardroom survey rated their confidence in the New Zealand economy at 3.23/5 on a scale of 1-5, where 1 signifies “much less optimistic” and 5 represents “much more optimistic”.

This year’s score is a significant improvement from last year’s 1.82/5.

In fact, this is the highest score for optimism in the New Zealand economy since 2016, when the previous National-led Government was in power under the prime ministership of Sir Bill English (3.6/5).

Mood of the Boardroom: New Zealand needs visionary leaders to tackle ageing population and healthcare costs (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: New Zealand needs visionary leaders to tackle ageing population and healthcare costs (NZ Herald)

With the country facing significant challenges both domestically and internationally, New Zealand, more than ever, needs leaders willing to take decisive action and implement big ideas, one of our most influential lawyers says.

Dentons New Zealand chairman and global vice-chairman Hayden Wilson, says to do this, the nation’s leaders must understand there are big differences between managing a business and running a Government.

“Governments are complex. Compared to business, you don’t have all the same levers to pull – and the lag time between pulling a lever and getting tangible progress is much longer.”

He argues simply applying a corporate mindset focused on short-term wins and quarterly goals isn’t sophisticated enough, on its own, to manage the complex challenges the country faces.

Truce on infrastructure

“Every person you speak to in the infrastructure space in New Zealand recognises that we have got to end the stop-starts and flip-flops on projects.”

He says there is a critical need for political leadership that thinks beyond election cycles.

“New Zealand has significant infrastructure demands over the next five, 10, 15 years and beyond.

“We’ve got an ageing population, increasing healthcare costs, and a changing global environment. We cannot just rely on the same old solutions.”

Wilson says the tendency of new Governments to scrap their predecessor’s projects is a waste of time, money, and planning effort, pointing to the Government’s decision to shelve Auckland Light Rail and the Three Waters reform when it came to power.

“The economy and business community would be better served if both parties took an approach of improving or adapting what’s already there, instead of throwing it all out and starting from scratch.”

Wilson suggests bipartisan agreement on infrastructure is not realistic, because political parties legitimately have different ideas. Instead, he suggests a “truce” on infrastructure.

“Parties are always going to have different ideas. But there needs to be some understanding that Governments should be allowed do the things they want, and once a project starts, it gets finished, no matter who’s in power.”

He references Bent Flyvbjerg’s How Big Things Get Done. Flyvbjerg is an expert on large-scale projects who advocates for “thinking slow, acting fast.”

Wilson explains: “We need to spend more time on planning and testing ideas before breaking ground. Once we start, we should be able to complete it efficiently and quickly”.

He says New Zealand, and others around the world, tend to do the opposite.

“We rush the planning phase because we know that, in political reality, once shovels are in the ground, projects rarely get stopped.

“This leads to poor planning, underestimating costs, and exposes us to risks like political changes or global events.”

Efficiency over cuts

Wilson also sees room for improvement in the Government’s approach to public sector spending.

He believes there has been too much emphasis on cost-cutting, and not enough on making the system more efficient.

“I don’t think you could find anyone who would say that there isn’t waste in the public sector and that it is delivering efficiency,” he says.

“But while the wholesale reduction in spending might be the fastest way to give the Government something it can point to and say it has done, it is perhaps not the best way to go about it.”

Instead, Wilson argues for a more strategic approach that balances the number and quality of public servants, the use of consultants, and the government’s ability to achieve its priorities.

“You can have two of those three things, but not all of them at once,” he explains. “If you want to reduce the size of the public sector while also cutting down on consultants, then you’re going to struggle to achieve all of the Government’s priorities because the capacity to do the work simply won’t be there.”

He suggests a more collaborative effort between the public and private sectors would be more effective in delivering on the Government’s goals.

“It’s about delivering value over the long term, not just making immediate savings. It may be a slower process, but it would yield better outcomes in the end.”

Dentons is a sponsor of the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom project.

Mood of the Boardroom: New Zealand businesses navigate geopolitical risks amid global instability (NZ Herald)

Mood of the Boardroom: New Zealand businesses navigate geopolitical risks amid global instability (NZ Herald)

As global instability grows, New Zealand boardrooms are increasingly focused on assessing and mitigating geopolitical risks.

Now in its third year, the Russia-Ukraine war, alongside the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict and rising tensions in the South China Sea, has made geopolitical challenges an unavoidable point of discussion.

These crises are affecting trade, sparking regional conflicts, and driving regulatory changes, with 72% of New Zealand’s top executives in the Mood of the Boardroom survey confirming that their businesses regularly assess vulnerabilities to these risks at the board level.

A further 27% of respondents say they do not have this on their risk matrix, and 1% remain unsure.

The growing complexity of global challenges has led New Zealand companies to adopt a more rigorous approach to risk assessment.

Capital Markets Report: How a record election year will shake up markets - Tim McCready

Capital Markets Report: How a record election year will shake up markets – Tim McCready

2024 has been dubbed “the year of the vote”.

There will be more elections this year than ever before in history, and by year-end, countries accounting for over 60 per cent of the world’s economic output and more than half of its population will have voted.

Some of the most consequential elections for the global financial landscape will be the United Kingdom general election on July 4 and the United States presidential election on November 5.

And just last week, India’s stock market took its worst tumble in four years after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost its parliamentary majority in India’s general election.

The US presidential election will be heated.

During the 2020 presidential debates, then-President Donald Trump warned of a market meltdown if Joe Biden was elected. Now, as the Republican Party’s presumptive nominee up against President Biden, Trump is at it again:

“If we lose, you’re gonna have a crash like you wouldn’t believe,” he told attendees at a campaign rally, suggesting his loss would result in “the largest stock market crash we’ve ever had.”

Yet, US stocks have reached record highs this year under President Biden, though Trump has been quick to take credit for the rise.

“This is the Trump stock market,” he posted on his own social media platform, Truth Social. “Because my polls against Biden are so good that investors are projecting that I will win, and that will drive the market up.”

Regardless of the rhetoric, US market analysts tend to agree that trying to attribute financial market performance in the medium to long-term on election outcomes is a fool’s errand.

Returns are more often dependent on economic and inflation trends.

In the current climate, a strengthening economy, corporate profit growth, expectations of interest rate cuts, and the allure of artificial intelligence are key reasons for stock market bullishness.

Trump’s unexpected election win against Hillary Clinton in 2016 did spark a stock market rally fuelled by promises of deregulation, tax cuts and infrastructure spending.

Last month, Trump made history – as the first former president to be convicted of felony crimes – when a New York jury found him guilty of all 34 charges in a scheme to illegally influence the 2016 election through hush money paid to porn actor Stormy Daniels, who said the two had sex.

Despite this, he can still campaign and ultimately become President of the United States. The US Constitution has very few restrictions on who is eligible to be a presidential candidate – having a criminal record is not one of them.

Trump’s guilty convictions did affect the share price of Truth Social’s parent Trump Media and Technology Group. The stock made a rip-roaring debut in March surging past US$70 (approx NZ$116) in early trade, giving the firm a market value of more than $9 billion.

But the stock, trading under the ticker “DJT”, fell as much as 15 per cent in extended trading after the convictions were announced – the share price was US$44.59 at the end of last week. Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes blames short sellers for the share price plunge and wants the Nasdaq to investigate.

Polling shows the race to the White House will be tight.

The latest Economist/YouGov poll shows that even after the guilty verdict, Trump remains in lockstep with Biden. Among registered voters, 42 per cent say they plan to vote for Biden, and 42 per cent for Trump.

Persistent inflation means the Biden campaign is struggling to allay voters’ concerns about the economy. There are also widespread concerns about Biden’s age, with a majority of voters who supported him in 2020 now saying that at 81, he is too old to be an effective president.

Although Trump is only four years younger than Biden, voters do not express the same anxieties about his age. However, there is significant uncertainty about the potential chaos a second Trump administration could bring with it.

Trump has promised steep tariffs of “upward of 60 per cent” on all Chinese imports if he regains the presidency – to bolster onshore manufacturing – conceivably leading to a global trade war. There is also concern over the impact on budget deficits from extended tax cuts which could keep inflation high for longer, hurt US government bonds and further blow out the US budget deficit, which is expected to hit $1.5 trillion by the end of the year.

Industries that look to benefit from Trump 2.0 include fossil fuel production and the broader energy sector. Trump has promised a more business-friendly approach to environmental regulation, along with cuts to the Department of the Interior (responsible for the management and conservation of federal lands and natural resources) and other environmental agencies.

He has also pledged to sharply reduce the powers of US financial regulators, which could assist smaller businesses burdened by regulatory compliance.

This move contrasts with the expanded oversight Congress gave the US government to prevent a repeat of the 2008 global financial crisis.

A Biden victory will benefit local industries aligned with his support for clean energy initiatives — including solar and renewable energy. Biden recently announced new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, batteries and solar cells, saying that Chinese government subsidies for EVs and other consumer goods give them an unfair advantage in global trade.

UK on track to change Government?

Meanwhile, the Rishi Sunak-Sir Keir Starmer head-to-head in the United Kingdom looks much more predictable than the US election, with Starmer’s centrist Labour Party consistently polling around 20 points ahead of the governing Conservative Party.

The anticipated change in government draws parallels to the historic 1997 election when the incumbent Conservative Party, led by John Major, suffered a resounding defeat to Tony Blair’s Labour.

When Prime Minister Sunak called the general election much earlier than anticipated last month, financial markets barely reacted to the news. The subdued response can be attributed to several factors. The Labour Party has been polling well ahead of the governing Conservative Party for some time, suggesting a Labour victory is already factored into the market.

The strong lead also means it is unlikely that Labour will adopt any policies that might unsettle the market to attract voters. Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has added further confidence to the market by committing to a self-imposed fiscal rule that will bind any future Labour government.

This stipulates that government debt as a percentage of GDP must decrease by the fifth year of the official forecast period.

According to a Citi analysis of stock market movements since 1979, UK stocks have historically been “relatively flat to down” in the six months following elections.

The analysis excluded the periods of volatile financial conditions during the dotcom crash and the global financial crisis.

The MSCI UK Index, which tracks the performance of large and mid-cap segments of the UK market, has historically risen by around 6 per cent six months after Labour Party victories, while it has decreased by around 5 per cent following Conservative wins.

The FTSE 250, which has a focus on domestic companies, tends to outperform the large-cap FTSE 100 following elections, particularly after Labour victories.

Sectors expected to benefit from the change in government, include house-building, infrastructure and clean energy projects, with support indicated by Labour.

It has also made bold commitments to enhance the financial services sector, which contributed 12 per cent of the UK’s economic output in 2023. Part of its plan includes making the UK a global hub for green finance, implementing a leading green finance regulatory framework, and collaborating with the financial services sector to support decarbonising homes.

It would also reinvigorate capital markets by reviewing the pensions retirement savings to boost investment in infrastructure and green industries.

Project Auckland: Panel discussion on ‘Accelerating Auckland’ (video)

Tim McCready moderates a panel discussion themed “Accelerating Auckland” with CEO of the EMA Brett O’Riley, Deputy Mayor of Auckland Desley Simpson, and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland Dawn Freshwater. The panel discussion was held at the launch of the NZ Herald’s 2024 Project Auckland report following a speech from the Minister for Auckland Hon Simeon Brown.